imotiv

Popular Posts

Thursday, April 11, 2013

The Staunton Chessmen


The Staunton Chessmen

staunton
The Staunton chessmen is the standard pattern for chess pieces used in all world chess federation and United States Chess Federation events.
Before 1849, there was no standard chess set or design. Original army designs representing play on a field of battle became chess pieces played in a royal court. The original chessmen of shah, counselor, infantry, cavalry, elephant, and chariot evolved into king, queen, pawn, knight, bishop, and rook.

As chess clubs and tournaments began to appear all over the world in the 18th and 19th century, it became necessary to use a standardized set (and rules) that would enable players from different cultures and countries to play chess without getting confused on what chess piece it was.
On March 1, 1849 the “Staunton” pattern was first registered by printer and editor Nathaniel Cooke. Prior to that, the pieces most commonly used were called the St. George design, followed by the English Barleycorn, the Northern Upright or Edinburgh (designed by Lord John Hay in the 1840s), the Regency, the Calvert, Lund and Merrifield designs.
Cooke registered his wooden chess pattern at the United Kingdom Patent Office (patent No. 58607) under the Ornamental Designs Act of 1842. The title of the registration was “Ornamental Design for a set of Chess-Men.” The registration was limited to Class II, which were articles mostly made from wood. The registration was good for only three years, and not renewable.
Cooke looked at a variety of popular chess sets (the Northern Upright is the closest in appearance to the Staunton design) and kept in mind their common traits. As an architect, he also looked the Victorian London’s neoclassical architecture and noticed there was a renewed interest in the ruins of ancient Greece and Rome after the rediscovery of Pompeii in the 18th century.
The design of the knight came from the head of a Greek horse of the Eglin Marbles in the British Museum (brought to the museum in 1806). The head of a horse of Selene, the Moon Goddess, came from the east pediment of the Parthenon in Athens, Greece. The Parthenon had a sculpture of horses drawing the chariot of Selene. That sculpture was controversially removed by Thomas Bruce (1766-1841), the 7th earl of Eglin, when he was ambassador to the Ottoman empire between 1799 and 1803. In 1816, he donated these “Eglin Marbles” to the British Museum.
In September 1849 the manufacturing rights were bought by John Jaques of London, workers of ivory and fine woods. His company also invented table tennis (originally called Ping-Pong), croquet, Snakes & Ladders, and Tiddly Winks.
Nathaniel Cooke was quite involved in the business of Jaques of London. Cooke’s daughter would marry John Jaques II in the 1850s. The sets were originally made in boxwood and ebony. The Full Size set was weighted for better stability. Later sets were available in ivory, first available in April, 1850, and unweighted. The unweighted king was 3.5 inches in size for the standard size. The weighted king was 4.4 inches in size for the Full Size. Jaques removed much of the decorative features that topped earlier chess patterns, and was able to manufacture the new design at less cost. The king was represented by a crown and the queen was represented by a coronet.
Some other features of the original Jaques set included a removable king’s cross and the knight made up of two pieces, the head and the base, which were screwed together. Every Jacques set had an imprinted “Jaques London” on the rim of the white king.
On September 8, 1849 the first wooden chess sets from Jaques was available. The first sets actually had a different pattern to the King’s Rook and King’s Knight that distinguished it from the Queen’s Rook and the Queen’s Knight. A crown emblem was stamped onto a rook and knight of each side to identify the positioning on to the king’s side of the board. That design failed to stick and was later removed.
Howard Staunton (1810-1874) saw Cooke’s chess set design and appreciated its simplicity. On the same day that the Jaques chess sets were available in London, Howard Staunton recommended and endorsed the sets in the September 8, 1949 issue of Illustrated London News. Staunton had a chess column in the Illustrated London News from 1845 until 1874, Nathaniel Cooke was Staunton’s editor at the Illustrated London News. The ad that appeared in the newspaper called it Mr. STAUNTON’s pattern. It said:
“A set of Chessmen, of a pattern combining elegance and solidity to a degree hitherto unknown, has recently appeared under the auspices of the celebrated player Mr. Staunton….The pieces generally are fashioned with convenience to the hand; and it is to be remarked, that while there is so great an accession to elegance of form, it is not attained at the expense of practical utility. Mr. Staunton’s pattern adopts but elevates the conventional form; and the base of the Pieces being of a large diameter, they are more steady than ordinary sets.”
Later, Staunton began endorsing the set and had his signature on the box of Staunton chess pieces. One of Staunton’s chess books was given free with every box of Staunton chess set. Staunton aggressively promoted the Staunton chess set. This may have been the first time that a celebrated name was used to promote a commercial product.
There is some speculation that Nathaniel Cooke was not the actual designer of the “Staunton” chess set. Cooke was also editor of the Illustrated London News, the world’s first illustrated newspaper. One of its major contributors was Staunton, who had a chess column.
Cooke may only have been an agent acting on behalf of the real designer, Jaques, his brother-in-law. And Jaques was looking for a way to increase his profits by creating a cheaper, more efficient design that appealed to the majority of chess players. So he got Staunton, the most famous chess player in England, to endorse the design.
The design was a huge success, and the Jaques company made a profit on the chess set. The simple, unadorned forms of the Staunton set made it cheap and easy to produce.
On August 11, 1852, Nathaniel Cooke entered into an arrangement with Howard Staunton to use Staunton’s name and facsimile signature on the labels that came with each set.
The original Staunton design has gone through different versions over the years. Some of the distinguishing characteristics that define a Staunton design include the following: the king is topped with a Formee cross and is the tallest piece; the queen is topped by a crown and ball; the bishop has a split top; the knight is a horse head; the rook is a squat castle turret. The shape of the pawn may have derived from the balconies of London Victorian buildings.

Later designs of the Jaques Staunton chessmen included slightly taller queens and pawns. Also, the weight of the chessmen was increased.
By the 1920s, the Staunton design was required as the only authorized design by worldwide chess organizations, and endorsed by FIDE, the world chess federation, in 1924

In 1935 the Jaques company no longer made ivory Staunton sets.
During World War II Jacques was asked by the British government to mass produce chess sets for the troops. The factory was later bombed by the Germans and destroyed.
At the start of the 1978 World Championship match in Baguio, Philippines there wasn’t a Staunton chess set in the city. Someone had to drive to Manila to find a Staunton chess set, which arrived just 15 minutes before the start of the scheduled match.

Wednesday, April 10, 2013

GM Jacob Aagaard


Grandmaster Jacob Aagaard


Jacob Aagard was born in Denmark on July 31, 1973 and later moved to Glasgow, Scotland.

In 1985, at the age of 12, Jacob learned how to play chess.
At age 16, he was the champion of his local chess club in Denmark.
In March 1997, he was awarded the International Master title.
He studied languages at the University of Copenhagen and Cognitive Semiotics at the University of Aarhus in Denmark.
In 2004, he co-founded Quality Chess publishing.
In 2004, he took 2nd place in the 111th Scottish Chess Championship.
In 2005, he took 1st place in the 112th Scottish Chess Champion, but the title went to Craig Pritchett since Aagaard was not yet a British citizen.
In 2006, he was in a blitz play-off for the Danish Championship, but lost his game to Steffen Pedersen and went from 1st place to 6th place.
In 2006, he represented Scotland as Board 4 in the Chess Olympiad.
In 2007, he won the 94th British Chess Championship. He was awarded the title of International Grandmaster in 2005.
In 2008, he represented Scotland as Board 2 in the Chess Olympiad.
In 2010, he reached his highest Elo rating: 2538.
In 2011, he was awarded the title of FIDE Senior Trainer. He also won the FIDE trainer’s Isaac Boleslavsky prize for best author.
In 2011, Aagaard no longer represented Scotland and played under the Danish flag.
In 2012, he won the Scottish Championship on tiebreaks with 7 points out of 9. The event was held at the Trades Hall in Glasgow. Aagaard was eligible for the title by virtue of residency in Scotland. In the final round for the Scottish title, he defeated GM Mark Hebden with the Scotch Opening.
Aagaard is one of the best chess trainers in the world. Here is some of his chess advice:
Spend 20 minutes a day on solving chess problems. Try to do that 4 to 6 times a week.
Write down your solutions of a chess position or problem before you check them out. Distrust what you first see. Do not write long essays, but write the move you want to play and the one or two key points (tactical, better position, threat, etc). Write down what you think reasonable quickly.
There is no “best” material or book. Take any chess book off your shelf. You do not have to buy a new book (except buying any of Aagaard’s books wouldn’t hurt).
Do not get burned out. Don’t tackle more than you can do. Don’t try to start out with 2 hours of study every day. It is all about setting moderately challenging targets for long term change.
Ask yourself three questions after every move. Where are the weaknesses? Which are the worst-placed pieces? What is your opponent’s idea?
Good chess comes from calculation, opening preparation and good intuition.
To make chess practical, make it simple. Ask yourself, what am I looking for in this position?
Write down the chess mistakes you make, and when you repeat them, write it down as well.
99% of all positions contain a multitude of ideas, but look for the one that you should take most seriously.
At the end of the day, chess is about solving one problem only: What should I play on the next move?
Nothing will bring you greater success than analyzing the position.
Throw away your nine-step thinking algorithms and forget about the tree of analysis.
Study traps. They are entertaining as well as instructive. When everything else has failed, try to read your opponent’s mind and see how you can get him to make a mistake. It will not work every time, but it can be a really useful skill to turn to.
Calculation is only a tool to aid in the decision-making process. The most important aspects of calculation are concentration and determination.
At the chess board, it is not important what we see, only what we play.
Making better decisions is what improving in chess is all about.
Improvement starts at the end of your comfort zone.
All successful training systems are based on incremental improvement, which take some time and effort.
No chess teacher can promise you the grandmaster title; you need a crooked organizer for that.
It is very rare that new combinations are played. Almost all combinations are based on well-known patterns. You need to spend a significant amount of time solving combinations.
The ability to focus on your opponent’s intentions, offensive or defensive, is essential for success in chess.
At times, it is essential to look for what is wrong with a move to a greater extent than what is good about it.
Ask yourself, what am I trying to achieve in the chess position? If you do not have a clear answer to this question, then this is the first thing to sort out. Make sure you have clearly defined your aim.
Calculate forcing moves first. You will learn more about the position this way, as well as satisfy the natural curiosity we all possess. Also, these lines tend to be easier to calculate than lines involving quiet moves.
Chess is about effective decision-making. Effective means quick. Only analyze necessary variations. Calculate slower. It saves time. It is quality over quantity. Make sure that you are calculating the right variations.
Don’t think about decisions that you need to make in the future.
Calculate only what you have to. Always consider whether or not it is necessary to calculate a variation deeply before doing so.
Calculate only until you can make a definite conclusion. It is bonkers to spend your precious time going deeper.
Calculate half a move longer. Make it a habit to look for candidates for a brief moment to avoid nasty surprises.
“New ideas at the start of a variation are a good deal more important than refinements at the end of it.” – Mark Dvoretsky
Don’t let your thoughts skip from one line to another and back several times over.
When you have made up your mind, execute your move. This prevents time trouble later on and later choosing moves inferior to your first decision.
Seek clear simple solutions in winning positions, and look for the opposite in lost positions.
Exposure to a great variety of chess positions is useful, but only if there is some sort of high quality interpretation as well.
People who analyze with computer tools without ever doubting them have a tendency to decline in playing strength and become frustrated.
Most tournament games are not won by superior calculation or imaginary power, but rather due to superior understanding of the very basics of the game.
Most games are decided on a superiority in the understanding of positional play.
In the endgame, the king can play actively play as a piece and only seldom will it be threatened with mate.
The main difference between the middlegame and the endgame is the absence of queens and the absence of consistent mating threats.
Keep your strongest piece active.
The rook should always be active as the governing principle of the rook endgame.
Pieces should be activated in descending order. This means queen before rook, rook before king, and king before minor pieces.
Good endgame technique requires the ability to think schematically. This means being able to search for specific positions or placements of the pieces in a given position, and then try to reach them by means of calculation.
An advantage does not have to be decisive in order to win.
The choice of moves should not be made on an exact verdict of the final position, but on whether or not your position has improved or worsened.
As an author, he has written or co-written:

Easy Guide to the Panov-Botvinnik Attack (1998)
Easy Guide to the Sveshnikov Sicilian (2000)
Easy Guide to the Sicilian Kalashnikov (2000)
Excelling at Chess (2001) (winner of the 2002 ChessCafe book of the year)
Dutch Stonewall (2002)
Queen’s Indian Defence (2002)
Meeting 1.d4 (2002)
Excelling at Positional Chess (2003)
Chess Software Users Guide (2003)
Excelling at Chess Calculation (2004)
Excelling at Combinational Play (2004)
Excelling at Technical Chess (2004)
Starting Out: The Gruenfeld Defence (2004)
Learn to Identify and Exploit Tactical Chances (2004)
Experts vs. the Sicilian (2004 and 2006)
Inside the Chess Mind (2004)
Practical Chess Defence (2006)
The Attacking Manual: Basic Principles (2008)
The Attacking Manual 2: Technique and Praxis (2008)
The Attacking Manual I and II (2010) (winner of the English Chess Federation (ECF) and Guardian Book of the Year awards)
Experts on the Anti-Sicilian (2011)
The Tarrasch Defence (2011)
Grandmaster vs. Amateur (2011)
Grandmaster Preparation – Calculation (2012)
Grandmaster Preparation – Positional Play (2012)
Grandmaster Preparation – Strategic Play (2013)

– Bill Wall
Share

Saturday, April 6, 2013

Results of Candidates


Candidates R14 – leaders lose, Carlsen qualifies

1.4.2013 - Magnus Carlsen overpressed a messy position against Peter Svidler and was swiftly punished. However Kramnik gambled all of his chips, and Ivanchuk simply took them all! Carlsen’s luck has not abandoned him and he is now the official challenger against Anand for the World Chess Championship, edging out the Russian’s great performance by virtue of his better tiebreak. Full report with GM analysis.
 
f
From March 14 to April 1, 2013, FIDE and AGON – the World Chess Federation’s commercial partner – are staging the 2013 Candidates Tournament for the World Chess Championship 2013. It will be the strongest tournament of its kind in history. The venue is The IET, 2 Savoy Place, London. The Prize Fund to be shared by the players totals €510,000. The winner of the Candidates will become the Challenger to Viswanathan Anand who has reigned as World Champion since 2007. The main sponsor for the Candidates is State Oil Company of the Azerbaijan Republic SOCAR, which has sponsored elite events chess in the past.

Round fourteen report

By GM Alejandro Ramirez

The most spectacular tournament of recent years has come to an end. The drama of the last few rounds has been unprecedented in recent memory. The excitement brought spectators flocking to every chess site, even to the point of overloading some of them! The fans were eager to know who would challenge Anand, and here is how it all unfolded.
Round 14 April 1 at 14:00
Magnus Carlsen
0-1
Peter Svidler
Vassily Ivanchuk
1-0
Vladimir Kramnik
Boris Gelfand
½-½
Alexander Grischuk
Levon Aronian
1-0
Teimour Radjabov
Playchess commentary: GM Maurice Ashley

Gelfand-Grischuk ½-½

Grischuk’s Gruenfeld was more than sufficient to neutralize any attempts for a lastround victory by the Israeli, and the game ended in a draw after White’s king was too exposed and had to allow a perpetual.

Aronian-Radjabov 1-0

Aronian, who after the first half seemed to be the only one with chances to stop Carlsen from playing Anand, suffered some serious setbacks in the second half and tried to have a strong finish. Radjabov, who probably wants to forget this tournament as soon as possible and losing over thirty (!?) rating points in the process, was looking to at least not lose the last round. Unfortunately the Armenian’s will was stronger and a complicated game led to an interesting endgame in which White had two rooks for Black’s queen. Although theoretically equal, the endgame was more pleasant to play with White, and after Radjabov made just one slip Aronian’s brutal attack on the king was enough to win the game.

Carlsen-Svidler 0-1

Everyone knew the tournament situation. Carlsen would look for a win, and try to clinch first place regardless of Kramnik’s result. A typical Spanish gave White a very minimal edge, and both sides tried to attack the enemy king using their knights and long range bishops. On move 31, disaster strikes. Svidler’s simple mate threat on g2 can be parried in two ways: one is a simple tactic that uses Black’s king on f8 to not only trade off the dangerous light squared bishop, but it also won a pawn. The other simply gave Black a strong attack. Carlsen, maybe exhausted from his efforts, chose the latter and almost paid dearly. The advantage was too strong; the pair of bishops and extra pawn were too much even for the Norwegian magician. Svidler defeated Carlsen.
Games - CBM 150
Learn more about this opening!
Carlsen, Magnus2872Svidler, Peter2747C77FIDE Candidates 20131401.04.2013Ramirez,Alejandro
1.e4 e5 2.f3 c6 3.b5 a6 4.a4 f6 5.0-0 e7 6.d3 The increasingly popular quick d3 system, yet again seen in London. Carlsen crushed Svidler with the black side of this system, surely he can also outplay him with white. b5 7.b3 d6 8.a3 0-0 9.c3 b710.d2 d7 11.a4 d8!? Very solid play, though there were viable alternatives for sure. The idea of moving the knight from c6 is nothing new in the Spanish. It is now being rerouted to f4. 12.axb5 axb513.xa8 xa8 14.e2 e6 15.g3 c5 16.f5 d8 17.c4 bxc418.xc4 White has a maybe microscopically more pleasant position. His bishop on c4 is well placed, the knight on f4 is relatively uncomfortable, but Black still has many resources. c7 19.e1 e820.c1 h520...d4 already blunders the game. 21.3xd4 cxd4 22.xg7+-21.g321.b4! cxb4 22.xb4 Would've given him a pleasant edge, but the symmetrical position gives Black good chances for a draw. 21...g6 22.h6+ g7 23.g5 xg5 24.xg5 d5 25.exd5 xd526.g4 f3 Svidler thought this idea was very strong, and that Carlsen underestimated it. However, it is possible both missed White's resource on move 31. 27.f6+ g8 28.h6+ f8 29.e329.xf7 xf6 30.h6+ e7? Suggested by Svidler.30...g8‼ is just a draw, according to the engines, as there are no good discoveries. Notice how in no variation can White take on e5 as the opening of the e-file will be lethal to him because of his weakened back rank. 31.xe5+? d5 32.xd7 xe1# 31.g5! Was missed by both players. 29...b7 30.h4 h3 31.f3? The start of Carlsen's demise.31.d5! This strong resource would've simply left White a pawn ahead. White's knight on h6 can be left en prise! xd5 32.xc5+g7 33.xd5 xh6 34.xf7 a534...c8? Svidler admitted he had no idea what was going on, and this was his suggestion. However this loses to the very strong...35.e7! and Black is closed to getting mated. 35.xe8 xe1 36.xe5 White's three pawns are stronger than the piece, and it is in Black's best interest to give it back immediately.xf2+ 37.xf2 xh2+ 38.e1 With only chances for White. 31...f4 32.gxf4 xh4 33.xf7 xf3 34.f2 g4+ 35.g3exf4 Now Black's advantage is clear and decisive. The pair of bishops is too strong. 36.xe8+ xe8 37.xg4 xg4 38.g5 h6 39.f7h5 40.h6 d1 41.f2 f3 42.h3 f4 43.f7 g5 44.e1 g4Simple calculation, White cannot stop the pawns. 45.hxg4 hxg446.xd1 g3 47.e1 g2 48.f2 h2 Carlsen loses, but his lucky stars had not yet abandoned him.

Ivanchuk-Kramnik 1-0

“If someone had told Volodia (Kramnik) that Carlsen would lose today, I’m afraid he wouldn’t have gone with the Pirc…” is the translation of Vallejo Pons earlier Facebook status. Truer words could not have been spoken! Knowing that the odds of Carlsen losing with White twice in one tournament were astronomical, Kramnik went for the all-out kill against Ivanchuk. However the Ukrainian is not someone to be trifled with.. He punished Kramnik’s excessive opening aggression, and quickly took over the initiative. A strong positional sacrifice left him with the pair of bishops and pressure all over the board, especially against the queenside pawns. Black’s position became increasingly worse with every move, until White’s passed b-pawn was too strong. It was all over. Ivanchuk equally slayed Kramnik and Carlsen, and the Norwegian edges out on tiebreak.
The ABC of Chess Openings - 2nd Edition
Learn more about this opening!
by Andrew Martin
Ivanchuk, Vassily2757Kramnik, Vladimir2810B08FIDE Candidates 20131401.04.2013Ramirez,Alejandro
1.d4 d6 2.e4 The Pirc. An obscure opening in the realm of elite players. Kramnik wasn't satisfied with neutralizing Ivanchuk, he was risking everything for the win. f6 3.c3 g6 4.f3 g7 5.e2 0-06.0-0 a6 7.h3 A classical and sedate approach. Strong both because of its positional value, but also because it steers the game away from the sharp complications Kramnik is so desperately looking for. c68.g5 b5 9.a3 h6 10.e3 e5 11.dxe5 dxe5 12.c1 h7?Already a mistake, however the 'correct' move was far from human.12...d4 13.xh6 b7 14.xg7 xg7 15.d1 c5 16.e3e7 And Black has some compensation, but no more. 13.c5 e8 14.d1 d7 15.b4 c8 16.e3 White has more space, better coordinated pieces and actual prospects of invading d5, unlike Black who cannot move to d4. Also White is the one that can break the queenside. A very uncomfortable situation for Black. d817.a4 bxa4 18.xa4 e6 19.c4 h5 20.c3 hf4 21.d5b5 22.b3 c6 23.a5 b7 24.g3! A valiant sacrifice. With the h-pawn gone, White can occupy the h-file, putting pressure on every side of the board. Further, Black is left without a plan and without the strong knight on f4. xh3+ 25.g2 hg5 26.h1 g8 27.xg5xg5 28.f3 xd5 29.xd5 c6 30.c4 c8 31.b3 h5 32.e3e6 33.ha1 h4 Giving back the pawn does not alleviate Black's problems - he doesn't even get access to the f4 square. However it was hard to suggest much of anything, let alone a way to win this game.34.gxh4 d8 35.xa6 c8 36.h1 c7 37.xe6 xe6 38.b5!White's now up a pawn, and Black has the horrible choice between exposing his king to a strong attack or allowing a strong passed pawn on b6. b738...cxb5 39.xe6 fxe6 40.xe6+ f7 41.xg6+- 39.b6 c5 40.b1 f8 41.d5 b8 42.ba1 d6 43.a8 xd544.xb8 xb8 45.exd5 d6 The b-pawn is too strong, White has only to march his king forward. 46.a6 b7 47.f1 The King goes to a6, the game is over, Kramnik resigns and Magnus wins the tournament!
Pictures by Ray Morris-Hill

GM Daniel King shows the highlights of the last round

Current standings

The table displays Kramnik ahead on traditional tiebreak points, but the Candidates Tournament rules counts the number of wins – Carlsen five, Kramnik four – to break the tie, after the first tiebreaker, score against each other, was even.

Replay all games of the round

The King’s Indian
Learn more about this opening!
by Viktor Bologan
Aronian, L2809Radjabov, T27931–0E71FIDE Candidates1401.04.2013
1.d4 f6 2.c4 g6 3.c3 g7 4.e4 d6 5.h3 0-0 6.g5 a67.f3 c5 8.dxc5 a5 9.d3 dxc5 10.0-0 c6 11.d5 e612.b3 b5 13.ac1 bxc4 14.xc4 xe4 15.b7 ac8 16.xe7xd5 17.xf8 b8 18.xb8 xb8 19.xd5 xf8 20.xe4 d721.b3 xa2 22.cd1 e5 23.d8+ e7 24.b8 xf3+ 25.xf3d4 26.g3 a5 27.e1+ f6 28.e2 b1+ 29.g2 a4 30.b7a3 31.d5 a2 32.xf7+ g5 33.h4+ h6 34.ee7 g5 35.e41–0
Select games from the dropdown menu above the board

Schedule and results

Round 1 March 15 at 14:00
Levon Aronian
½-½
Magnus Carlsen
Boris Gelfand
½-½
Teimour Radjabov
Vassily Ivanchuk
½-½
Alexander Grischuk
Peter Svidler
½-½
Vladimir Kramnik
Playchess commentary: GM Daniel King
Round 2 March 16 at 14:00
Magnus Carlsen
½-½
Vladimir Kramnik
Alexander Grischuk
½-½
Peter Svidler
Teimour Radjabov
1-0
Vassily Ivanchuk
Levon Aronian
1-0
Boris Gelfand
Playchess commentary: GM Chris Ward
Round 3 March 17 at 14:00
Boris Gelfand
0-1
Magnus Carlsen
Vassily Ivanchuk
0-1
Levon Aronian
Peter Svidler
1-0
Teimour Radjabov
Vladimir Kramnik
½-½
Alexander Grischuk
Playchess commentary: GM Yasser Seirawan
Round 4 March 19 at 14:00
Magnus Carlsen
1-0
Alexander Grischuk
Teimour Radjabov
½-½
Vladimir Kramnik
Levon Aronian 
½-½
Peter Svidler
Boris Gelfand
½-½
Vassily Ivanchuk
Playchess commentary: GM Daniel King
Round 5 March 20 at 14:00
Vassily Ivanchuk
½-½
Magnus Carlsen
Peter Svidler
½-½
Boris Gelfand
Vladimir Kramnik
½-½
Levon Aronian
Alexander Grischuk
½-½
Teimour Radjabov
Playchess commentary: GM Yasser Seirawan
Round 6 March 21 at 14:00
Peter Svidler
0-1
Magnus Carlsen
Vladimir Kramnik
½-½
Vassily Ivanchuk
Alexander Grischuk
½-½
Boris Gelfand
Teimour Radjabov
0-1
Levon Aronian
Playchess commentary: GM Chris Ward
Round 7 March 23 at 14:00
Magnus Carlsen
½-½
Teimour Radjabov
Levon Aronian
½-½
Alexander Grischuk
Boris Gelfand
½-½
Vladimir Kramnik
Vassily Ivanchuk
½-½
Peter Svidler
Playchess commentary: GM Alejandro Ramirez
Round 8 March 24 at 14:00
Magnus Carlsen
½-½
Levon Aronian
Teimour Radjabov
0-1
Boris Gelfand
Alexander Grischuk
1-0
Vassily Ivanchuk
Vladimir Kramnik
1-0
Peter Svidler
Playchess commentary: GM Alejandro Ramirez
Round 9 March 25 at 14:00
Vladimir Kramnik
½-½
Magnus Carlsen
Peter Svidler
½-½
Alexander Grischuk
Vassily Ivanchuk
1-0
Teimour Radjabov
Boris Gelfand
1-0
Levon Aronian
Playchess commentary: GM Maurice Ashley
Round 10 March 27 at 14:00
Magnus Carlsen
1-0
Boris Gelfand
Levon Aronian
1-0
Vassily Ivanchuk
Teimour Radjabov
½-½
Peter Svidler
Alexander Grischuk
0-1
Vladimir Kramnik
Playchess commentary: GM Yasser Seirawan
Round 11 March 28 at 14:00
Alexander Grischuk
½-½
Magnus Carlsen
Vladimir Kramnik
1-0
Teimour Radjabov
Peter Svidler
1-0
Levon Aronian
Vassily Ivanchuk
½-½
Boris Gelfand
Playchess commentary: GM Chris Ward
Round 12 March 29 at 14:00
Magnus Carlsen
0-1
Vassily Ivanchuk
Boris Gelfand
½-½
Peter Svidler
Levon Aronian
0-1
Vladimir Kramnik
Teimour Radjabov
½-½
Alexander Grischuk
Playchess commentary: GM Daniel King
Round 13 March 31 at 14:00
Teimour Radjabov
0-1
Magnus Carlsen
Alexander Grischuk
½-½
Levon Aronian
Vladimir Kramnik
½-½
Boris Gelfand
Peter Svidler
1-0
Vassily Ivanchuk
Playchess commentary: GM Daniel King
Round 14 April 1 at 14:00
Magnus Carlsen
0-1
Peter Svidler
Vassily Ivanchuk
1-0
Vladimir Kramnik
Boris Gelfand
½-½
Alexander Grischuk
Levon Aronian
1-0
Teimour Radjabov
Playchess commentary: GM Maurice Ashley
The games start at 14:00h = 2 p.m. London time = 15:00h European time, 17:00h Moscow, 8 a.m. New York. You can find your regional starting time here. Note that Britain and Europe switch to Summer time on March 31, so that the last two rounds will start an hour earlier for places that do not swich or have already done so (e.g. USA). The commentary on Playchess begins one hour after the start of the games and is free for premium members.

Links

The games will be broadcast live on the official web site and on the chess server Playchess.com. If you are not a member you can download a free Playchess client there and get immediate access. You can also use ChessBase 12 or any of our Fritz compatible chess programs.